The Abandonment

BOOK DESCRIPTION

THE ABANDONMENT: How Muslim Nations Quietly Withdrew from Palestine—And Why Trump 2.0 Sealed the Deal

The Uncomfortable Truth About Palestine and the Muslim World

When Donald Trump returned to the White House in January 2025, Muslim-majority nations faced an impossible choice: solidarity with Palestine or economic survival. Through systematic analysis of United Nations voting patterns spanning two decades, verifiable trade data exceeding $10 billion between Israel and Abraham Accords signatories, and examination of diplomatic statements versus policy actions, Dr. Naim Tahir Baig reveals their answer—and why it was never really a choice at all.

They chose survival. Quietly. Strategically. Irreversibly.

The Abandonment is a comprehensive analysis of how Trump's return to power accelerated a two-decade withdrawal from the Palestinian cause that most Muslim nations refused to acknowledge publicly. While public rhetoric remained unchanged—fiery speeches, social media solidarity, and declarations of unwavering support—the reality told a different story. One vote at a time, one abstention at a time, Muslim nations walked away from Palestine.

What Makes This Book Different

This is not another polemic about Middle Eastern politics. This is data-driven analysis that documents what politicians denied: economic interest has defeated religious solidarity.

The book tracks how Muslim nations' voting patterns at the United Nations have shifted dramatically. Recent UN General Assembly votes demonstrate this trend: the September 2025 resolution on Palestinian statehood passed with 142 votes in favor, but Muslim-majority nations showed increasing abstentions and absences compared to previous decades. The statistical pattern proves that GDP per capita and trade dependency predict voting behavior more accurately than religious affiliation or historical commitment.

Inside the United Nations: Diplomatic Reality

Through analysis of UN voting records and diplomatic statements, Dr. Baig exposes the performance art of international diplomacy. The gap between what leaders say and what they do has widened considerably. While Muslim leaders deliver passionate speeches about Palestine at OIC summits and regional forums, their nations' actual voting records and economic policies tell a contradictory story.

The book quantifies this "Rhetoric-Reality Gap"—the widening chasm between public solidarity and actual policy. Countries post Palestinian flags on social media, then abstain on crucial humanitarian resolutions. 

The Uncomfortable Questions

Would you have done differently in their positions? If you were Indonesian president, would you choose jobs or Jerusalem? If you were Saudi crown prince, would you prioritize security or solidarity?

Is economic pragmatism immoral or realistic? Can solidarity exist in a globalized economy? What does this reveal about human nature and the limits of religious and ethnic identity?

Last line: "They called it betrayal. We called it survival. History will judge which it was. But for now, the abstentions speak louder than any prayer."

Why This Book Matters Now

This is not just a book about Palestine. It is a book about the death of solidarity in the age of globalization. It proves, with documented evidence and analytical rigor, that economic interdependence has dissolved all forms of ideological unity.

The international "community" is fiction. Pan-movements are dead. Economic nationalism has won. The age of ideology is over.

The voting records don't lie. This book explains why they matter.